Visiting Forces Agreement Latest News

The VFA is a 1998 agreement between Manila and Washington on the protocol for the U.S. military in the country. Controversial provisions include the lax visa and passport policy for U.S. troops and the power of the U.S. government to retain jurisdiction over the military if they ever commit crimes on the ground. According to the text of the diplomatic note, the six-month waiver “may be extended by the Philippines for a further six months.” At the end of this period, Manila, unless further action is taken, would return to its original plan to denounce the agreement, which was first announced on 11 February 2020. On February 11, Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte announced that Manila would denounce the U.S. and Philippine Visit mission agreement (VFA), an agreement that allows the U.S. military to move to the Philippines. Duterte`s decision was taken in Washington with deep concern about the possible consequences of the Indopa-Pacific strategy, which was essentially aimed at countering China`s growing ability to impose itself. Paradoxically, the fatal blow to the VFA could come from Washington itself rather than from Manila. Asked about Duterte`s denunciation of the agreement, Trump said, “I don`t mind them wanting to do it.

It will save a lot of money. … My opinions are different from the others. Trump`s statement underscores his general lack of esteem for international agreements and alliances in favor of his “America First” policy. However, the two leaders spoke on 19 April and it was not known whether the VFA was running. Whatever happens, the fate of the VFA will determine the tone of the Alliance at least for the remainder of Duterte`s mandate until 2022, if not beyond. In February, Duterte ordered the termination of the Visiting Forces Agreement, jeopardizing security coverage for the Philippines, which is increasingly hostile to Chinese actions in the South China Sea. Under the agreement, Washington and Manila had 180 days after giving notice – in this case until August – to try to salvage the deal. Topics: government and politics, global politics, defense, defense and national security, foreign policy, Philippines, United States, Asia, China, Indonesia, Vietnam, Malaysia, Malaysia, Brunei-darussalam On that day, the Philippine government led by President Rodrigo Duterte officially denounced the United States, which would cancel the agreement that governs the status of U.S.

forces in the Philippines. The agreement also defines the jurisdiction and procedures applicable to all U.S. military and civilian personnel who commit a crime in the Philippines, as well as visa and passport requirements. Custodio said Manila needed the Alliance more than the United States, adding that the economic impact of the coronavirus pandemic would “strengthen” the Philippines` ability to maintain and modernize its armed forces. Disputes over the cost of rebuilding bases have contributed to the U.S. significantly reducing its military footprint in the Philippines, Schaus said. The VFA was signed in 1998 to reduce the administrative burden required for U.S. forces to travel to the Philippines. Although Duterte threatened to reject U.S. forces in 2016, he also clearly benefits from U.S. military assistance in those operations – and Manila may need more support since 11 of its soldiers have just been killed in the fight against the Terrorist Group Abu Sayyaf in Sulu.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Comments are closed, but you can leave a trackback: Trackback URL.